By Francis Samuels

One pursuit that has always been consistent as found among the Revolutionary guild is the dream of eliminating distinctions among races, ethnicities, and peoples.

This is not merely my opinion.

In a moment I will provide an avalanche of quotes that will prove this to be the case.

What I want to do now is tee these quotes up by pointing out the reality that it is the clergy and the church now who are hot in pursuit of the same thing. It is a preponderance in the clergy who are telling us that God loves inter-racial marriage and there is nothing in the slightest wrong with that. Indeed, it is to be preferred in order to break down preexisting barriers. Churches now that are people-group integrated are churches that are automatically superior to churches that are not people-group integrated.

Already, some will experience the vapors about what I’ve written above. But all I am pointing out is that this mindset that praises the pursuit of ethnocide of all ethnicities has always been the pursuit of the Marxist Revolutionary and inasmuch as we in the Church are pursuing the same end for all intents and purposes we declare ourselves to be functional Marxists.

This is not a blanket condemnation of those Christians who have married inter-racially. Obviously, the grace of God is not defeated by those normatively unwise marriages, nor by our contribution to the pursuit of eliminating distinct racial-ethnic lines of both husband and wife. In heaven, because of God’s grace, there will be many many children of mixed-race marriages.

We should note also that were we living in normal times where people understood, as their ancestors did, the necessity to normatively, regularly, and routinely marry among their own people, the problem of people failing to do that would not be as acute. However, we live in an age where one has to be lobotomized in order not to see the agenda that exists to encourage the One World Order necessity of the whole world being melange-ed into a mutt existence. We see this push for miscegenation in the college catalogs that come to our doors. We see this push for miscegenation on the billboards dotted across the nation. We see this push for miscegenation in the ads that come in the magazines we read. We see this push for miscegenation repeatedly in the films and TV shows with which we indoctrinate ourselves. And as said earlier, we see it now praised in the churches we attend. If you’re Asian and not dating a black chick there is something wrong with you. If you’re a white woman and refuse to date a sub-continental Indian then you are obviously a bigot. If you go even further and suggest dating like this is not a good idea and marrying like this is even a worse idea you are worse than a plague.

As we said at the beginning, though, that has always been the plan of the Revolutionary. Throughout history, the Marxist Revolutionary has touted the elimination of races, ethnicities, and people-groups in favor of literally bleeding all colors into one.

So, if you, dear reader, are in favor of this melanginization — this muttifying of all mankind – then your allegiance to the cause of Marxism is no longer in doubt. You are a functional Marxist. Remember: it is not possible to arrive at the muttifying of all mankind without the muttifying that happens in each miscegenated marriage. So, you get no relief from the reality that you are a Marxist by saying, “Well, in this one case I think it is all right, but everywhere else is a problem.”

The quotes below demonstrate that the Marxist agenda has always been identical to what the Church now favors. Of course, the reality of these quotes won’t make much difference to people. The quotes will just be ignored. Some will even go so far as to say “Well, the Marxists didn’t get everything wrong and this is something they got right.”

Read em and weep:

1.) “Princes and nations will disappear without violence from the earth, the human race will become one family and the world the abode of reasonable men.”

-Adam Weishaupt, quoted in Paul Johnson, Intellectuals (London: Orion Books Limited, 1993), p. 32.

2.) “Capitalism developed the ever more inhuman polarization of the sexes. The cult of making distinctions, which serves only for oppression, is now being swept away by awareness of resemblance and identity.”

– M. Walser
‘Uber die neusten Stimmungen im Westen’
In: Kursbuch, Bd. 20, 1970, S. 19-41.

3.) ”What will be the attitude of communism to existing nationalities?
The nationalities of the peoples associating themselves in accordance with the principle of community will be compelled to mingle with each other as a result of this association and hereby to dissolve themselves, just as the various estate and class distinctions must disappear through the abolition of their basis, private property.”

~ Frederick Engels in The Principles of Communism, 1847

4.) “The equality of races and nations is one of the most important elements of the moral strength and might of the Soviet state. Soviet anthropology develops the one correct concept, that all the races of mankind are biologically equal. The genuinely materialist conception of the origin of man and of races serves the struggle against racism, against all idealist, mystic conceptions of man, his past, present and future.”

—Mikhail Nesturkh, Soviet anthropologist
The Origin of Man (Moscow, 1959)

5.) “The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into small states and end all national isolation; not only to bring the nations closer together but to merge them….”

Vladimir Lenin, The Rights of Nations to Self Determination — pg. 76

6.) “… Just as mankind can achieve the abolition of classes only by passing through the dictatorship of the proletariat, so mankind can achieve the inevitable merging of nations only by passing through the transition period of complete liberation of all oppressed nations, i.e., their right to secede. “

Vladimir Lenin, ibid.

7.) “(Moses) Hess had taught Marx that socialism was inseparable from internationalism. Marx writes in his Communist Manifesto that the proletariat has no fatherland. In his Red Catechism, Hess mocks the fatherland notion of the Germans, and he would have done the same with the fatherland notion of any other European nation. Hess criticized the Erfurt program of the German Social-Democrat Party for its unconditional recognition of the national principle. But Hess is an internationalist with a difference: Jewish patriotism must remain. He writes,

‘Whoever denies Jewish nationalism is not only an apostate, a renegade in the religious sense but a traitor to his people and to his family. Should it prove true that the emancipation of the Jews is incompatible with Jewish nationalism, then the Jew must sacrifice emancipation… The Jew must be, above all, a Jewish patriot.’

“I agree with Hess’ patriotic ideas to the extent that what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. I am for every kind of patriotism – that of the Jews, the Arabs, the Germans, the Russians, the Americans. Patriotism is a virtue if it means the endeavor to promote economically, politically, spiritually, and religiously the welfare of one’s own nation, provided that it is done in friendship and cooperation with other nations.”

~Richard Wurmbrand, Marx & Satan, pp.54-55

8.) This, from Igor Shafareivich’s “Socialist Phenomenon,” Shafareivich is commenting on that which is characteristic of all International Socialist expressions:

“The national question: ‘National differences and antagonistic interests among various peoples are already vanishing more and more and more thanks to the development of the bourgeoisie, to freedom of commerce, to the world market, to uniformity in the mode of production and in the corresponding conditions of life. The supremacy of the proletariat will accelerate the disappearances of differences.”

9.) “Even the natural differences within species, like racial differences…, can and must be done away with historically.”

-‘K. Marx’s Collected Works V:103’,
As cited in S.F. Bloom’s The World of Nations: A
Study of the National Implications in the Work of Karl Marx, Columbia University Press, New York, 1941, pp. 11 & 15-19

10.) “Full-scale Communist construction constitutes a new stage in the development of national relations in the U.S.S.R., in which the nations will draw still closer together until complete unity is achieved…. However, the obliteration of national distinctions and especially of language distinctions is a considerably longer process than the obliteration of class distinctions.”

-Nikita Khrushchev

The fact that all this has come into the Church is seen by the two quotes we finish with. The Church somehow thinks it can baptize this Marxism and Christianize it:

11.) “The more Christianity spreads, the more these racial, ethnic, and national distinctions will be erased because no culture will be left untouched by the Gospel. When all (cultures) are affected, they will be one culture — Christendom.”

-Some 21st Century “Christian Reconstructionist Theologian”

12.) “We hear much about “identity politics” today. Christianity beat the movement to that concept by many centuries. Our identity is not ours to choose, however. Our identity is not determined by our genetics or our economic status. No, the Christian message about identity is an easy one: Christ is all and in all. He is our identity. His sacrifice redeems us, His intercession assures us, and as we live in recognition of His centrality in all things, the human-derived divisions that plague all of mankind are put aside. We come to one table, as one people, and the only lens we need for that is the one that shows us the Lord of glory, Jesus.”

-Some 21st Century Baptist High Profile “Apologist”

As long as this continues, the Church is Ichabod.

If you’re in a church that supports this leave now before the Marxists convince your children of the need to “bleed into one.”