“Before Marxists attained power in Russia and China, the proposition was widely believed, government likes religion. Wanting honesty and service, it hopes that religion helps to make honest men who serve. But government is ever aware that religion is unpredictable and that prophets are hard to control. To rule men needs compromise. In face of the sacred is always an unbendable will. Government likes religion to bless its acts, crown its dictators, sanction its laws, define its wars as just, be decorous master of national ceremonies. And since on grounds of religion religious men may criticize acts or laws or wars or modes of waging war, government prefers quietness and contemplation to excess of zeal. Though religion is important to government, it does not value excess of religion. It is happy with general morality, reasonable and moderate, but is uncomfortable with too much enthusiasm.” ~ Owen Chadwick in The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century
Facial Justice
“[Thomas More’s Utopia] was followed for the next few centuries by other utopian socialist writers, who refined More’s basic outline in terms of a more consistent, thoroughly paganized, socialist vision. In general, no practical steps were suggested for alleviating the condition of the poor; the image of the suffering poor was simply dredged up in order to incite hatred and envy against the rich. The philosophers were explicit in their insistence upon complete standardization: increasingly, equality meant identity. They dreamed of the “inevitable” approach of the socialist ideal, of total equality under a total State, when language would become static and unchanging, reading (and eventually thinking) would atrophy, all days would be alike, and even facial appearances would be identical.” ~ David Chilton in Igor Shafarevich’s The Socialist Phenomenon
Family as the Pattern for Nations
“The tribes [of Israel] existed by circumstances of birth before circumcision was reinstituted by Moses and their structure was not altered by the rite. As with all other nations, membership was normally by birth: the structure was given in the created order of the family, and that in turn was the pattern for the structure of the nation.
The human rights notion of the human race as essentially formed by the will of man entering into social contract is notoriously scandalized by the existence of races, peoples, nations, tribes and languages. Even to insist that these groups do exist is to risk the derisive epithet of ‘racist.’ But to deny that they not only exist but that they are unalterable and determinative of human order is to deserve to be called a fool and a liar. National and language groupings have prevailed in the United States over as many as seven or eight generations of the imaginary ‘melting pot,’ and show no signs of dissolving even though, for most, English has become the mother tongue. Even the major church divisions retain the national divisions brought over from Europe and Britain: the various Lutheran bodies, Dutch and German Reformed, Presbyterian (Scottish), Anglican or English, as well as Irish Catholic as distinct from Italian, Polish or Spanish. Jews, to be sure, are fiercely Jewish, despite the abrasions between the Ashkenazies, the Sephardim and those from Central Europe and Russia. Nobody has yet integrated the Negro race, changed their color or destroyed their elusive community structure.
Trying to be God Through False Charity
“[G]odly man must recognize that he has the obligation to be without pity and without charity in dealing with some, that this attitude, however harsh it may seem in terms of modern sentimentality, constitutes moral strength and spiritual integrity. He must recognize that he cannot rob himself or others in order to feed the undeserving of the world, or the improvident who demand as their right a portion of our wealth. … [T]rue stewardship means a humility whereby man avoids a fundamental sin common to false charity, that of trying to be God. In false charity the whole world is re-ordered and the nature of reality amended by the rebellious man, a would-be god whose societal forms and life constitute an act of warfare against God and His Word. False charity is therefore a war against reality, and every war against reality is an insanity foreordained to destruction.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony in Politics of Guilt and Pity
Islamic Violence: God’s Judgment on the West
The violence recently seen in Sweden and London is without a doubt some of the most brutal Islamic violence ever seen since the Turks besieged Vienna.
With the rioting quelled for the moment, the Main Stream Media (MSM) is scrambling to deflect and justify two weeks of Islamic rioting in Sweden and the brutal beheading of a British soldier in London by a black immigrant along their traditional lines that it was because of “discrimination” and “economic disenfranchisement.”
Could this be the game changing moment the Right has been looking for? Who knows? Perhaps it is wishful optimism that would cause such thinking? It it is still too early to tell.
TT Live 25: Jann and Adi on a Theological Understanding of the Political History of the Boers in South Africa
Listen to two (father/son) Boer/Afrikaners discuss the political history of the Boer people from a Christian covenantal perspective.
General show outline:
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
TT Live 24: Jaymie Dobb on Orania, South Africa
Tune in June 15 @ 10PM EST for an interview with Jaymie Dobb about his visit to Orania, South Africa.
Topics:
- My Journey to South Africa/Experiences in SA
- The History of the Afrikaner
- Life in Apartheid South Africa
- Portugal’s African Adventures
- Rhodesia/Zimbabwe
- British Israel World Federation
- Israel/South African ‘Alliance’
- My Trip to Orania
- Siener van Rensburg
- Future of the Afrikaner
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
TT Live 23: Jaymie Dobb on UK Happenings
Tune in June 1 @ 10PM EST for an interview with Jaymie Dobb from Nottingham, UK. He’ll give us an update on what’s happening across the pond.
Show Notes:
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Kinism FAQ: Is Kinism Historical?
In this Kinism FAQ, Christian Gray discusses the historical case for Kinism.
Outline
- Objection: Just because something was widely practiced doesn’t mean it’s normative
- Response
- Anti-Kinists respond with Marxist tactics
- Example: Retarded OPC pastor
- Lack of evidence strong support for Kinism
- Southern Agrarians
- Westminster Question 127: What is the honor that inferiors owe to their superiors?
- Other references
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
TT Live 22: KPaul on the Cause of the Confederacy
For the LORD shall judge his people, and have compassion on his servants, when he sees that their power is gone, and there is none left, slave or free. -Deuteronomy 32:36
Join us Saturday, May 11th at 10pm EST as KPaul and Christian Gray discuss the cause of the Confederacy. We’ll chat about the reasons for the war, Mississippi life during forced integration, and why the South must rise again.
Links mentioned:
Yonderfield Blog Lincoln: A brief introductionKing Lincoln Archive from Lew Rockwell
Podcast: Play in new window | Download