“[H]umanity is the true god of the Enlightenment and of French Revolutionary thought. In all religious faiths, one of the inevitable requirements of logical thought asserts itself in a demand for the unity of the godhead. Hence, since humanity is god, there can be no division in this godhead, humanity. Mankind must therefore be forced to unite. Since Enlightenment philosophy is monistic, this means an intolerance of differences as unessential. National and racial differences, instead of being God-given and possessing richness and dignity to be respected, are to be obliterated. The goal is not communion but uniformity. Again, since humanity is god, the killing of any man either for crimes or in warfare is an offense. (The only permissible killing is possibly George Bernard Shaw’s execution ‘in a kindly manner’ of the enemies of socialism.) Humanistic pacifism is the result, and a pro-one-World, United Nations, peace-at-any-price faith. The godhead must be united. This faith finds expression in the U. S. Department of State Publication 7277, ‘Freedom From War,’ September, 1961. This faith was expressed in the midst of war by Churchill and F. D. Roosevelt in Point 8 of the Atlantic Charter, and was ascribed to their governments: ‘They believe all the nations of the world, for realistic as well as spiritual reasons, must come to the abandonment of the use of force.’ But Scripture does not consider the legitimate use of force as an evil but rather as a necessity and a good to be used to prevent the rise and triumph of evil. Roosevelt’s faith required messianic intervention with force and at the same time a condemnation of all force! Because of this coincidence of messianic interventionism and pacifism, this philosophy has created war even where men have talked most about world peace. The very idea of a United Nations requires war, in that it insists on irreconcilable and contradictory things. First, it insists on uniting a world and leveling all differences. Anyone with a sense of integrity must inevitably resist this leveling. Second, it seeks to create a super-state which must increasingly coerce every state, civil government, and person into line with its dream of messianic power. Third, it seeks to arrest history and freeze it into a particular mold in terms of Enlightenment thought. Inevitably, this faith is anti-Christian, and a conflict with Christianity is requisite to its being.” ~ R. J. Rushdoony in This Independent Republic
Category Archives: Race & Reason
Facial Justice
“[Thomas More’s Utopia] was followed for the next few centuries by other utopian socialist writers, who refined More’s basic outline in terms of a more consistent, thoroughly paganized, socialist vision. In general, no practical steps were suggested for alleviating the condition of the poor; the image of the suffering poor was simply dredged up in order to incite hatred and envy against the rich. The philosophers were explicit in their insistence upon complete standardization: increasingly, equality meant identity. They dreamed of the “inevitable” approach of the socialist ideal, of total equality under a total State, when language would become static and unchanging, reading (and eventually thinking) would atrophy, all days would be alike, and even facial appearances would be identical.” ~ David Chilton in Igor Shafarevich’s The Socialist Phenomenon
Happy MLK Day
As we celebrate the man who gets credit for the ubiquitously celebrated intrusion into the white man’s wallet, neighborhood, and payroll known as the Civil Rights laws, we pause to highlight the heroic content of Martin Luther King’s character, rather than judge him by the color of his skin.
Michael Eric Dyson, Professor of sociology at Georgetown University, has written a biography of MLK entitled “I May Not Get There with You: The True Martin Luther King, Jr.” In this book he documents many juicy details on King.
Choosing More Than Hats
Here’s another typically reckless post by a modern egalitarian Christian apologist who has jettisoned the rational defense the faith in preference for apologizing for the faith of our fathers. The matter of contention was the doctrine of Kinism, which, like many other true doctrines once universally embraced by Christendom, has been betrayed by the Church for the 30 silver pieces of trendiness and political correctness. It’s more important to align with and please liberals, Communists, Talmudists, homos, lesbians, liberals, and all other Bible thrashers than to agree with every elect soul that existed before 1960.
Jared Taylor on the Jewish Question
any white advocates are grateful for the work of Jared Taylor. He’s at the forefront of racial realism as a researcher, writer, conference speaker, and leader. His American Renaissance magazine and website enjoy widespread respect among white advocates. But as white advocacy work is at some level invariably involved with the Jewish Question, many in the movement wonder why Taylor is not. What are this forerunner’s views about the racial group that is at the forefront in stifling white advocacy?
Another Clueless SCV Official
A controversy errupted in Michigan a few weeks ago over students wearing Confederate flag clothing to school. Support for the students that wore the gear was considerable, and a poll from the local news agency that ran the story reveals that 71 percent don’t think wearing Confederate flag items to school is a big deal. Still, confusion arose over such issues as whether the Civil War was fought over slavery and whether our country was founded on equality. An expert on each side of the debate weighed in here.
John Piper Is Still a Racist
ohn Piper continues to use his notable Christian influence to encourage believers to stamp out the racial diversity God created, and in particular to promote white genocide by interracial marriage and adoption. He has posted an excerpt from his book Bloodlines: Race, Cross, and the Christian in AntiChristianity Today. The piece is called John Piper: I Was Racist with the tag line, How the pastor of Bethlehem Baptist Church went from a self-described racist to an adoptive father of an African American.
The Destruction of Innocence: The Joel Diekhoff Story
Click to Support Joel Diekhoff!
For anyone watching the news over the past 2 weeks, you’ve probably heard of the evil racist that maliciously harassed a black man in Coeur d’Alene. As a result, the PC pundits of the area are applauding the CDA police for ridding the land of another racist hater. To hear their side, the conviction is guaranteed and we can all live with more peace of mind.
When the initial story broke I had to read a few times, thinking either it was satire or some of the poorest journalism I’d ever encountered. The gist was that a known Aryan Nation member had yelled racial slurs at a black man out jogging. At which point the black man showed up with a baseball bat, stepped onto the property of the white man, and threatened to bash his face in.
Bastard Sons of Confederate Veterans
This abominable photo was celebrated on the official Sons of Confederate Veterans Facebook page. Notice quality comments such as “THE SOUTH RUULLEESS!!!!!!!!!” and “bad ass mother f in marines!!.” Also notice the pornographic/perverted “shocker” sign the murderer middle-right is holding up. GO USA!
In the conversation to your right, the SCV Admin tried to spin the photo as an a-political and benign picture of “Southern” men continuing the tradition of carrying the battle flag into (unjust) wars. But something in his ethical theory appeared askew when Christian Gray, Robert Fort and others noticed that in the picture’s caption the Admin was calling any man (without qualification) who serves in the US army “brave,” and wishing all the mercenary scum in the photo a happy Veterans Day. Just what was the SCV Admin celebrating by pointing to a picture of modern day Lincoln troops invading another innocent nation?
Rev. Paul T. McCain: Minister of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda
In this utterly ignorant Facebook Note (blog post here), Pastor Paul McCain showcases why the Church is dead. His asinine State school propaganda and bourgeois Fox News style rhetoric can be pursued on your own time. The issue here transcends his grade school view of Lincoln’s war; it is about a type of treason and cowardice which can only displayed in learned “ministers” of the gospel.
You see, if the church is the ground and pillar of truth, the salt and light of the world, then we expect all Elders of Christ’s church to be at the forefront of exposing and challenging the tyranny that assaults their sheep. Precisely because the shepherd of souls has this weighty responsibility, James says that not many should become teachers as such will bear stricter judgment (James 3:1). Pulling down strongholds and bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ is the line of work that wins you scars, not friends.