Category Archives: Kinism

Meet the New Boss – Same As the Old Boss. Quite Literally. Some Kinist Views On the Electioncapades

By Colby Malsbury

You might have noticed a recurring theme on the redpilled substrata of social media this past little while. To wit:

Hot diggedy doo, aren’t the wokie libs just exhaling the copium in exhilarating waves of failure since November 5^th? This is some world-class salt, fam! Why, the blue-haired lesbian element on TikTok is threatening to never sleep with another man as long as they live LOL LMAO good job getting your neighbors out to vote with promises of beer and pizza on your Mastercard afterwards, everybody! This is what winning looks like, and I’m not tired of it yet! Have you ever seen such amazing 33^rd degree chess being played before??? read more

The Good Samaritan Fallacy

By Ehud Would

You can also read the following article at Ehud’s blog by clicking here.

Dr. Romberg famously identified Galatians 3:28 as the most abused passage in scripture, but Luke 10:25-37 is close competition. The parable of The Good Samaritan is a favored prooftext of the New Age religion masquerading as Christianity today. Alienists interpret it to say that all men of non-White races are naturally good by way of the imago dei (a Latinism that incidentally came into vogue only in the Post-War Consensus civil rights revolution) while White Christians are innately corrupt by way of “Privilege,” “Whiteness,” and “Supremacy”; and any Whites still concerned with proximate duties of the law such as patriotism, border security, or natural family are deemed reprobate. The only escape from that damnation for Whites is to lay down our lives, our country, and our children, for any man of a foreign race irrespective of his attitude toward us or our King. read more

David Platt Lies About Acts 17 and Mass Migration

By Davis Carlton

David Platt has recently spoken up once again in order to shill for mass migration. In a recent interview Platt says that “there is a problem when Christians in the United States are the most resistant to refugees in our communities.” Platt continues by stating, “We believe in Acts chapter 17…God orchestrates the movements of peoples among the nations that they might be found by Him.” Platt then goes on to comment about how God is bringing people here from places in the world that have “little to no access to the Gospel.” The implication being that Christians must support mass migration and refugee resettlement in order to fulfill the Great Commission. read more

The Shimmering Unreality of Doug Wilson’s Thought Experiments

By Davis Carlton

Rev. Michael Spangler’s series on race realism posted at the Pactum Institute has prompted a response from Doug Wilson in which he purports to demonstrate “The Shimmering Unreality of Race Realism.” Wilson’s response to Spangler is mostly an exercise in various thought experiments that are supposed to demonstrate how Spangler’s stance regarding the reality of race is incorrect. Wilson takes Spangler to task for stating that racial differences are “relatively permanent,” and that “for all practical purposes, race is immutable.” Wilson claims that there is “extreme mutability of what Spangler is calling race.” He uses this thought experiment to illustrate what he is talking about: read more

The Bible and National Identity: A Continued Response to Charles Johnson

By Davis Carlton

Charles Johnson of Reformed Theology Delatinized has responded to Rev. Michael Spangler’s series on Race Realism posted at the Pactum Institute Blog. I encourage everyone to read Spangler’s own response that he has posted to Johnson’s critique. I have given a preliminary response to Johnson in which I specifically critique his claims that Spangler uses certain passages that are descriptive in nature and thus cannot be used to derive imperatives. In other words, Johnson argues that just because God has created the various races and ethnic groups, we cannot infer that these are central to our identity or that we are required to preserve our distinct ethnic or racial identity. In this response I would like to interact with the arguments that Johnson makes in regards to the Law and how it pertains to the preservation of national identity. read more

A Matter of Is vs. Ought: A Response to Charles Johnson on Race Realism

By Davis Carlton

Charles Johnson, writing at the blog Reformed Theology Delatinized, has responded to Rev. Michael Spangler’s series on race realism posted at the Pactum Institute blog. Johnson concedes that Spangler is basically correct regarding the reality of race and that whites are being replaced in America, but that is the extent of his agreement. Johnson quotes Spangler’s saying that race realism is the belief that “race goes deep, extending to countless other realities, physical, cultural, intellectual, moral, and spiritual.” Johnson then argues that “A more historic name for this doctrine would be ‘racism.’” Johnson ignores the actual history of the frivolous accusation of “racism,” which sets the tone for the rest of his response. read more

Understanding The Sin of Partiality

By Davis Carlton

Christian nationalists in general and Kinist ethno-nationalists in particular are often accused of the sin of partiality. The sin of partiality (called “respect of persons” in older English translations), is often defined broadly to include any preference that a man would have for his own people. This includes a desire to live among and be ruled by those of the same ethnicity, race, and culture. This accusation is usually used against white people in a way that never seems to be consistently applied to those of other races when they express similar preferences. This tactic has met with a decent amount of success because of the ability of pastors to appeal to Scriptures that do condemn something called partiality. The major problem is that partiality is left undefined. The implication being that the sin of partiality condemns any kind of in-group preference as being sinful. read more

Doug Wilson Defines Ethnicity

By Davis Carlton

Doug Wilson has recently produced a video on his Blog & Mablog YouTube channel in which he undertakes a definition of ethnicity. As a Kinist or ethno-nationalist I believe that ethnicity is essential to national identity. This means that understanding ethnicity is critical to understanding the Biblical approach to national identity. I made this case when I noted that the simple question: What is a nation? is able to show the clear problems with those who reject a Kinist understanding of nationhood. Many who reject Kinism will say that they also reject globalism as an opposing extreme while tacitly accepting globalist principles and undercutting any real basis for national distinctions based upon their false, half-baked definitions of nationhood. I applaud Wilson’s efforts at defining ethnicity because, as I mentioned before, this is the direction that the conversation needs to take. Unfortunately, I find Wilson’s rhetoric only continues to muddy the waters rather than providing needed clarity. read more

Some Kinist Musings on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Version 20.0 or Whatever

By Colby Malsbury

It would be hilarious if it weren’t so painfully obvious and stilted.

Not even a week after national security adviser/amateur soothsayer Jake Sullivan cooed that the Middle East was at its quietest since 9/11, Israel engaged in the utterly thinkable and wrought yet another botched attempt to drive Amalek – whom you might be better acquainted with as ‘Palestine’ – into the sea. It’s a generational rite of passage at this point in history, emerging like clockwork every ten years like a Red Sox pennant race or a Rothschild-financed ‘grassroots protest movement’ that’s gonna topple the existing globalist regime for one and all times. read more

Owen Strachan DESTROYS Kinism! Part 2

By Davis Carlton

Owen Strachan has recently decided to go on the war path against Kinism. He has published an article called Against Kinism and Open Borders: A Christian Response to Political Polarities in which he lays out his case. Strachan begins by suggesting that conservative evangelicals have been right to oppose open borders, but the reason for this is essentially limited to concerns over security, and certainly not concerns over racial, ethnic, or cultural preservation. Strachan gives lip service to opposition to “leftist globalism” that Strachan calls “a grave problem” which “should be opposed in no uncertain terms.” read more