Category Archives: Kinism

What is a Nation? Cody Lawrence Steps Up To The Plate

By Davis Carlton

I’m pleased that the topic of the Biblical concept of nationhood is gaining more traction. I have gone on record saying that Kinists need to press the question: What is a nation? The reason being that the answer to this question is thoroughly and unambiguously Kinist. The Biblical authors absolutely and uniformly consider nations to be hereditary subdivisions of mankind. Opponents of Kinism or ethno-nationalism are backed into a corner of having to oppose the concept of nationhood that is taught in the Bible. The Biblical definition of nationhood is being rediscovered by a younger generation of Christians who are finding out that the concept of nationhood has been redefined in recent decades to mean something other than what it has meant throughout history. Once one understands what the Bible means about nationhood, the rest of Kinism naturally follows. Those who oppose ethno-nationalism are given the tough task of trying to show that the Biblical concept of nationhood is, in fact, not tied to ethnicity or common ancestry. Enter Cody Lawrence. read more

Doug Wilson’s Obfuscation on the Post-War Consensus

By Davis Carlton

Doug Wilson recently posted a video on his Blog & Mablog YouTube channel called Epistemological Impudence and The Post-War Consensus. He has a real knack for coming up with titles that just roll off the tongue. The thesis advanced by Wilson is that World War II set the stage for the zeitgeist of relativism. The secular elites adopted relativism because they came to believe that deeply held beliefs and dogmas were the cause of war with all of its accompanying atrocities. The solution was: mix in some relativistic “paint thinner” with our convictions to make sure that the evils that brought about the world wars could be avoided in the future. Wilson recalls a rancorous classroom discussion in the 1970s in which a young woman complained about how the deep seated convictions of Christians made them “just like the Nazis.” read more

How I Became a World War II Revisionist

By Davis Carlton

The recent controversy involving Joel Webbon and the promulgation of the Antioch Declaration has prompted me to explain why I have come to believe the revisionist narrative regarding the Second World War. For context, my reason for delving into this topic is because Joel Webbon is being accused of harboring Nazi sympathies because of his decision not to discipline a member who had the temerity to private send a meme via text that questioned the official narratives of the Holocaust. Pastors like James White, Doug Wilson, and Joe Boot have taken particular offense with those who would dare to question the received orthodoxy of the official narrative. They spearheaded the “Antioch Declaration” to define orthodoxy on the subject of World War II in addition to condemning ethno-nationalism. read more

Meet the New Boss – Same As the Old Boss. Quite Literally. Some Kinist Views On the Electioncapades

By Colby Malsbury

You might have noticed a recurring theme on the redpilled substrata of social media this past little while. To wit:

Hot diggedy doo, aren’t the wokie libs just exhaling the copium in exhilarating waves of failure since November 5^th? This is some world-class salt, fam! Why, the blue-haired lesbian element on TikTok is threatening to never sleep with another man as long as they live LOL LMAO good job getting your neighbors out to vote with promises of beer and pizza on your Mastercard afterwards, everybody! This is what winning looks like, and I’m not tired of it yet! Have you ever seen such amazing 33^rd degree chess being played before??? read more

The Good Samaritan Fallacy

By Ehud Would

You can also read the following article at Ehud’s blog by clicking here.

Dr. Romberg famously identified Galatians 3:28 as the most abused passage in scripture, but Luke 10:25-37 is close competition. The parable of The Good Samaritan is a favored prooftext of the New Age religion masquerading as Christianity today. Alienists interpret it to say that all men of non-White races are naturally good by way of the imago dei (a Latinism that incidentally came into vogue only in the Post-War Consensus civil rights revolution) while White Christians are innately corrupt by way of “Privilege,” “Whiteness,” and “Supremacy”; and any Whites still concerned with proximate duties of the law such as patriotism, border security, or natural family are deemed reprobate. The only escape from that damnation for Whites is to lay down our lives, our country, and our children, for any man of a foreign race irrespective of his attitude toward us or our King. read more

David Platt Lies About Acts 17 and Mass Migration

By Davis Carlton

David Platt has recently spoken up once again in order to shill for mass migration. In a recent interview Platt says that “there is a problem when Christians in the United States are the most resistant to refugees in our communities.” Platt continues by stating, “We believe in Acts chapter 17…God orchestrates the movements of peoples among the nations that they might be found by Him.” Platt then goes on to comment about how God is bringing people here from places in the world that have “little to no access to the Gospel.” The implication being that Christians must support mass migration and refugee resettlement in order to fulfill the Great Commission. read more

The Shimmering Unreality of Doug Wilson’s Thought Experiments

By Davis Carlton

Rev. Michael Spangler’s series on race realism posted at the Pactum Institute has prompted a response from Doug Wilson in which he purports to demonstrate “The Shimmering Unreality of Race Realism.” Wilson’s response to Spangler is mostly an exercise in various thought experiments that are supposed to demonstrate how Spangler’s stance regarding the reality of race is incorrect. Wilson takes Spangler to task for stating that racial differences are “relatively permanent,” and that “for all practical purposes, race is immutable.” Wilson claims that there is “extreme mutability of what Spangler is calling race.” He uses this thought experiment to illustrate what he is talking about: read more

The Bible and National Identity: A Continued Response to Charles Johnson

By Davis Carlton

Charles Johnson of Reformed Theology Delatinized has responded to Rev. Michael Spangler’s series on Race Realism posted at the Pactum Institute Blog. I encourage everyone to read Spangler’s own response that he has posted to Johnson’s critique. I have given a preliminary response to Johnson in which I specifically critique his claims that Spangler uses certain passages that are descriptive in nature and thus cannot be used to derive imperatives. In other words, Johnson argues that just because God has created the various races and ethnic groups, we cannot infer that these are central to our identity or that we are required to preserve our distinct ethnic or racial identity. In this response I would like to interact with the arguments that Johnson makes in regards to the Law and how it pertains to the preservation of national identity. read more

A Matter of Is vs. Ought: A Response to Charles Johnson on Race Realism

By Davis Carlton

Charles Johnson, writing at the blog Reformed Theology Delatinized, has responded to Rev. Michael Spangler’s series on race realism posted at the Pactum Institute blog. Johnson concedes that Spangler is basically correct regarding the reality of race and that whites are being replaced in America, but that is the extent of his agreement. Johnson quotes Spangler’s saying that race realism is the belief that “race goes deep, extending to countless other realities, physical, cultural, intellectual, moral, and spiritual.” Johnson then argues that “A more historic name for this doctrine would be ‘racism.’” Johnson ignores the actual history of the frivolous accusation of “racism,” which sets the tone for the rest of his response. read more

Understanding The Sin of Partiality

By Davis Carlton

Christian nationalists in general and Kinist ethno-nationalists in particular are often accused of the sin of partiality. The sin of partiality (called “respect of persons” in older English translations), is often defined broadly to include any preference that a man would have for his own people. This includes a desire to live among and be ruled by those of the same ethnicity, race, and culture. This accusation is usually used against white people in a way that never seems to be consistently applied to those of other races when they express similar preferences. This tactic has met with a decent amount of success because of the ability of pastors to appeal to Scriptures that do condemn something called partiality. The major problem is that partiality is left undefined. The implication being that the sin of partiality condemns any kind of in-group preference as being sinful. read more