Dracula, the Wandering ((( ))), and ‘Blood Libel’

By Ehud Would

A large portion of this essay could be written from either end of the spectrum, Right or Left. Were I a Leftist, however, it would be a “call-out” and cancellation of Bram Stoker and the entirety of the Vampire genre. Even the Vampire archetype, itself.

But as a Christian, I necessarily approach the matter from the Right. Which means I can embrace the DRACULA story for the sociopolitical analogy the author meant it to be. Something which bears intrinsically on our contemporary political scene.

 DRACULA is the story of a Levantine prince of limitless fortunes, who, having cursed Christ and rejected the covenant, was transformed into a living-dead (one who seems alive, but is ultimately dead inside) demoniac who moves under cloak of darkness, subsisting parasitically on the blood of the Christian peoples amongst whom he roams. He is lord over all “children of the night.”

He must elude the light of day. He is forever tied to the tombsoil of his native land, which Stoker describes as having “smelled [of] ole Jerusalem”. He loathes mirrors for he can neither see himself as others do, nor bear to look on his own evil. He is repulsed by the Cross, the Host, and Scripture. He has preternatural powers of persuasion and mind control which grow stronger upon invitation into Christian domains. He preys especially on women, children, and the weak of faith and mind. Damned are the souls who do not resist him. And he has a special grievance against the conspicuously Germanic Van Helsing, for recognizing what Dracula is, and resisting him effectively.

But the vampire ever regards himself the hounded victim, and his victims at once, both his contemptible tormentors, and his livestock whom he may cull at whim.

Even if the Gentile world is terrified to acknowledge it today, everything about the Vampire archetype is an allusion to Jews. And Jews themselves are entirely cognizant of the fact. To the extent that the Jewish director Karl Freund, Jewish Producer Carl Laemmle Jr., and the Jewish Wardrobe department, etc. in the 1931 film adaptation not only cast a particularly Jewish-looking Bela Lugosi as the vampire, but underscored his Jewishness by hanging a “Star of David” prominently about his neck, as seen in the top image of this article.

Furthermore, virtually every documentary on the subject of the Universal Monster films includes the Jewish filmmakers’ own interpretation of their monsters as intentional analogies of the Jews. Because Jews always identified with the monsters. The monsters were, from the Jewish vantage, the victims. And the torch and pitchfork-wielding Euro-Christian society always signified their oppressors and the rightful objects of the monsters’ wrath.

By the time Bram Stoker published DRACULA in 1897, nearly 50,000 Jews had settled in England. Most had come out of the East – places like Romania/Transylvania. Secretive, insular, and more ethnically nepotistic than any other group, they rapidly gathered to every hub of finance, commerce, and government. As PM Benjamin Disraeli (a Jew-turned-Christian) disclosed in his book, Coningsby, back of every gentile king, president, and prime minister is one interconnected Jewish government manipulating all from the shadows.

But they lived close enough for Christians to bear perpetual witness of the apostle’s testimony (1 Thessalonians 2:15) that Jews bear an entrenched hatred of all mankind.

They also observed ongoing Jewish blood rites like Bris wherein a Mohel literally sucks the blood from a circumcision, sometimes even mingling that blood and saliva into wine to be drunk by himself and the child’s parents. Likewise with Kapparot, the ritual exsanguination-sacrifice of chickens.

Against the backdrop of Shakespeare’s Shylock demanding his pound of flesh, even the exclusivity of their kosher butchery practices was suggestive of things malign.

But, aside from their usury, and history of poisoning wells, it was the hundreds of years of Jews prosecuted for abduction and murder of Christian children by exsanguination (so-called Blood Libel), and the ritual sacrifice of the Messiah back of it, that really solidify the Vampire mythos. Especially their self-cursing at the crucifixion: “Let His blood be upon us and our children!” This self-indictment in the greatest crime of the ages looms eternal over them as a sentence of living death.

While usury is, by way of parasytism, analogous to Vampirism, the method of Jewish ritual murder was literal Vampirism.

Though emphatically repudiated now as one big elaborate “antisemitic conspiracy theory”, no exculpatory evidence is offered in the matter. To even weigh the evidence is now deemed ‘antisemitic’. So says every media operative and gatekeeper. So it must be true, right?

Let’s check the work of our self-appointed masters and consider their ruling on the matter:

Both sides allege an international multigenerational conspiracy. And these two diametrically opposed positions are really without any third option. The question is – which conspiracy theory is more likely? Either Jews were engaged in an international child-abduction and ritual murder campaign spanning a millennium, as Christians alleged, or Christians were the ones ritualistically bleeding out their own children and  framing the Jews for it over and again for centuries by disposing of the bodies on Jewish properties.

Even when the identity of Jack the Ripper (whom Sir Arthur Conan Doyle analogized in his story The White Chapel Vampire) was confirmed by a spectrum of evidence including DNA, to be Jewish Immigrant, Aaron Kosminski, the media retort was a familiar one: “The Ripper murders were really an elaborate antisemite frame-up!”

Besides which, we have a contemporary Rosetta Stone which corroborates the standard Christian perspective in ages past: at the intersection of foreign subversion, anti-Christianity, feminism, anti-familism, child-trafficking, young blood therapies, the adrenochrome trade, abortion, organ-harvesting, mock cannibalism, the push to normalize real cannibalism, normalization of MAPS (i.e., pedophilia) and childgrooming, Spirit Cooking”, etc., we always find the same group occupying the space and pushing the envelope. Indeed, the ‘smell of ole Jerusalem’ hangs thick over Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Marina Abramovic, Lady Gaga, the Podesta brothers, and most other arch villains today. But noticing it is deemed a worse crime than all their atrocities combined.

We even have the testimony of whistleblowers such as Vicky Polin who’ve defected from Jewish groups which carry on the tradition of ritual murder

Indeed, the perceptive reader has no doubt noticed that the title of this piece has been of necessity edited to placate the infernal rage of Count Zuckula and the other dark lords of social media. To do otherwise would be to risk termination of our Tribal Theocrat page. But rest assured: when these ghouls kill off a Gentile page, they engage in the Silicon Valley equivalent of blood ritual: mining all these dead pages’ data, and selling such to the highest bidder….with the ADL usually coming out on top, no doubt. But doubtless ‘supreme irony’ is also an anti-semitic canard, so let us move on.

Well might some speculate that all of this stems from the Sabbatean-Frankist tradition of “redemption through evil”. There certainly is more than a little Frankism in Marx’s Materialism, and Anton LaVey’s (Levy’s) Church of Satan doctrine. And those no doubt dovetail into the hedonistic blood rites of Marina Abromovic and her devotees among the world elite. But their vampiric practices predate the Frankists by many centuries.

And while the vampires with whom we contend originate in Khazaria rather than old Israel (a thing verified by DNA as well as history, and admitted by Jewish scholars), their identification with Judaism means they have voluntarily donned the same self-cursing as the Jews who hunted Christian blood in the first century; those whom scripture declared Devilseed (John 8:44-45) who “both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are hostile to all men.” (1 Thess. 2:15)

Christ also warned, however, of the coming of these Khazarian converts: “Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! You compass land and sea to make a single proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.” (Matt. 23:15)

“To us forever are the gates of heaven shut;

For who shall open them to us again?

We go on for all time abhorred by all;

A blot on the face of God’s sunshine;

An arrow in the side of Him who died for man.”

~Bram Stoker, DRACULA

 

One thought on “Dracula, the Wandering ((( ))), and ‘Blood Libel’

  1. Donald Wright

    Count Orlok, the vampire in the 1922 German-expressionist Murnau-directed film Nosferatu, with his enormous proboscis and ratlike features, is perhaps even more plainly representing the predatory outsider than is Count Dracula in the Universal film of a decade later!

Comments are closed.