Their Blood Cries Out: The Murder & Betrayal of Austin Metcalf

1 Reply

By Ehud Would

You can also read Ehud’s original post at his blog, here.

The horror of Austin Metcalf’s murder at the hands of Karmelo Anthony follows a long sad pattern in this country – a pattern of White people slaughtered by demoniac negroes whose actions are excused and/or instantly forgiven by the victims’ families. And all absent any hint of contrition on the part of the killers.

Essential to this pattern is the fact that moderns will feel more outrage at the words “demoniac negroes” than at Blacks’ ongoing predation on the children of our people.  read more

What is a Nation? Cody Lawrence Steps Up To The Plate

2 Replies

By Davis Carlton

I’m pleased that the topic of the Biblical concept of nationhood is gaining more traction. I have gone on record saying that Kinists need to press the question: What is a nation? The reason being that the answer to this question is thoroughly and unambiguously Kinist. The Biblical authors absolutely and uniformly consider nations to be hereditary subdivisions of mankind. Opponents of Kinism or ethno-nationalism are backed into a corner of having to oppose the concept of nationhood that is taught in the Bible. The Biblical definition of nationhood is being rediscovered by a younger generation of Christians who are finding out that the concept of nationhood has been redefined in recent decades to mean something other than what it has meant throughout history. Once one understands what the Bible means about nationhood, the rest of Kinism naturally follows. Those who oppose ethno-nationalism are given the tough task of trying to show that the Biblical concept of nationhood is, in fact, not tied to ethnicity or common ancestry. Enter Cody Lawrence. read more

Doug Wilson’s Obfuscation on the Post-War Consensus

By Davis Carlton

Doug Wilson recently posted a video on his Blog & Mablog YouTube channel called Epistemological Impudence and The Post-War Consensus. He has a real knack for coming up with titles that just roll off the tongue. The thesis advanced by Wilson is that World War II set the stage for the zeitgeist of relativism. The secular elites adopted relativism because they came to believe that deeply held beliefs and dogmas were the cause of war with all of its accompanying atrocities. The solution was: mix in some relativistic “paint thinner” with our convictions to make sure that the evils that brought about the world wars could be avoided in the future. Wilson recalls a rancorous classroom discussion in the 1970s in which a young woman complained about how the deep seated convictions of Christians made them “just like the Nazis.” read more

Engaging Rich Pierce on The Good Samaritan

By Davis Carlton

            Rich Pierce of Alpha & Omega Ministries is not happy.  He’s upset with Kinists, writing “When they come to the NT they fall apart. Look at my threads, they start with personal attack, then they want to link me to articles that turn Luke 10:36-37 on its head.”  Pierce recently has been counter-signaling Eric Conn and Joel Webbon on X (formerly Twitter).  Pierce took umbrage at Webbon’s suggestion that Jews were uniquely hostile to Christian Nationalism.  At which point I chimed in.  I told Pierce that Jews were in fact uniquely hostile to Christianity and that while I pray for their conversion, that it would be better for Western countries to be free of Jewish influence.  Pierce asked me about a New Testament instruction.  Not knowing what exactly Pierce had in mind I replied, “Sounds good. That being said, I don’t think that Christians are required to tolerate Jews in positions of authority or influence in their societies while also praying and hoping for their conversion.” read more

How I Became a World War II Revisionist

By Davis Carlton

The recent controversy involving Joel Webbon and the promulgation of the Antioch Declaration has prompted me to explain why I have come to believe the revisionist narrative regarding the Second World War. For context, my reason for delving into this topic is because Joel Webbon is being accused of harboring Nazi sympathies because of his decision not to discipline a member who had the temerity to private send a meme via text that questioned the official narratives of the Holocaust. Pastors like James White, Doug Wilson, and Joe Boot have taken particular offense with those who would dare to question the received orthodoxy of the official narrative. They spearheaded the “Antioch Declaration” to define orthodoxy on the subject of World War II in addition to condemning ethno-nationalism. read more

Meet the New Boss – Same As the Old Boss. Quite Literally. Some Kinist Views On the Electioncapades

By Colby Malsbury

You might have noticed a recurring theme on the redpilled substrata of social media this past little while. To wit:

Hot diggedy doo, aren’t the wokie libs just exhaling the copium in exhilarating waves of failure since November 5th? This is some world-class salt, fam! Why, the blue-haired lesbian element on TikTok is threatening to never sleep with another man as long as they live LOL LMAO good job getting your neighbors out to vote with promises of beer and pizza on your Mastercard afterwards, everybody! This is what winning looks like, and I’m not tired of it yet! Have you ever seen such amazing 33rd degree chess being played before??? read more

Joke’s On Us: The Failed Approach of Matt Walsh’s Documentary, Am I Racist?

By Davis Carlton

Matt Walsh’s new film produced by the Daily Wire: Am I Racist? A Comedy To Die D.E.I. For, was released a couple of weeks ago in theaters. The film comes on the heels of Walsh’s recent success with his documentary What Is a Woman? Unlike his previous feature, Walsh utilizes a “mockumentary” style for, Am I Racist? In this film Walsh isn’t trying to have serious discussions with proponents of “Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTM” but rather inject humor into interactions with several D.E.I. advocates aimed at mocking the absurdity of “anti-racism.” read more

The Good Samaritan Fallacy

By Ehud Would

You can also read the following article at Ehud’s blog by clicking here.

Dr. Romberg famously identified Galatians 3:28 as the most abused passage in scripture, but Luke 10:25-37 is close competition. The parable of The Good Samaritan is a favored prooftext of the New Age religion masquerading as Christianity today. Alienists interpret it to say that all men of non-White races are naturally good by way of the imago dei (a Latinism that incidentally came into vogue only in the Post-War Consensus civil rights revolution) while White Christians are innately corrupt by way of “Privilege,” “Whiteness,” and “Supremacy”; and any Whites still concerned with proximate duties of the law such as patriotism, border security, or natural family are deemed reprobate. The only escape from that damnation for Whites is to lay down our lives, our country, and our children, for any man of a foreign race irrespective of his attitude toward us or our King.  read more

David Platt Lies About Acts 17 and Mass Migration

By Davis Carlton

David Platt has recently spoken up once again in order to shill for mass migration. In a recent interview Platt says that “there is a problem when Christians in the United States are the most resistant to refugees in our communities.” Platt continues by stating, “We believe in Acts chapter 17…God orchestrates the movements of peoples among the nations that they might be found by Him.” Platt then goes on to comment about how God is bringing people here from places in the world that have “little to no access to the Gospel.” The implication being that Christians must support mass migration and refugee resettlement in order to fulfill the Great Commission. read more

The Shimmering Unreality of Doug Wilson’s Thought Experiments

By Davis Carlton

Rev. Michael Spangler’s series on race realism posted at the Pactum Institute has prompted a response from Doug Wilson in which he purports to demonstrate “The Shimmering Unreality of Race Realism.” Wilson’s response to Spangler is mostly an exercise in various thought experiments that are supposed to demonstrate how Spangler’s stance regarding the reality of race is incorrect. Wilson takes Spangler to task for stating that racial differences are “relatively permanent,” and that “for all practical purposes, race is immutable.” Wilson claims that there is “extreme mutability of what Spangler is calling race.” He uses this thought experiment to illustrate what he is talking about: read more