Kinism FAQ: Is Kinism Historical?

kinismIn this Kinism FAQ, Christian Gray discusses the historical case for Kinism.

Outline

  1. Kinism the universal practice of recorded history
    • Objection: Just because something was widely practiced doesn’t mean it’s normative
    • Response
    • Anti-Kinists respond with Marxist tactics
  2. That which is said about us can be said of our ancestors
    • Example: Retarded OPC pastor
  3. Where are the Creeds?
    • Lack of evidence strong support for Kinism
    • Southern Agrarians
    • Westminster Question 127: What is the honor that inferiors owe to their superiors?
    • Other references
  4. America founded as Kinist country
  5. What happened?

Transcript and Addendum

4 thoughts on “Kinism FAQ: Is Kinism Historical?

  1. lazarusnorth

    Thanks Christian! I’m really enjoying this series.

    You mentioned in your closing comments that there has never been a successful multi-racial society. Perhaps Daniel 2:43 is applicable here:

    “As you saw iron mixed with ceramic clay, they will mingle with the seed of men; but they will not adhere to one another, just as iron does not mix with clay.”

  2. Kevin Alawine

    Very good Christian! I’m saving all of these in this series. Well, I’m saving ALL your shows.

  3. Matt B

    This is an impressive FAQ. I have to mention that I’m currently reading “Judaism’s Strange Gods” by Michael Hoffman. There is frightening similarity between the Judaic Rabbinic authority, our modern legislator and (dare I say) our contemporary Christian church leaders.
    Like the rabbinic authorities the law makers and Christian leadership are moronically following in Judaism’s hell bound foot steps by creating law and reason that compromises if not nullifies the authority God himself.
    These are the signs of the times we live in. Be aware of the false teachers and anti-Christs that are given so much mention in the Bible. Especially the warnings in the New Testament.

Comments are closed.