In this brief Kinism FAQ, Christian Gray discusses typical White Nationalist criticisms of Christianity.
- Jesus was Jewish
- Christianity comes from Judaism
- Ethical objections: Christianity seems to teach things that are Judaistic
- Pray, have faith, don’t worry about our enemies
- Don’t judge
- Love your enemies, pray for persecutors, turn the other cheek
- Give up all your possessions
- Put God before family
- Jew worship
- Christianity’s evangelistic inclusion of Jews and blacks poses threats to European communities.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
I’d like to thank you for starting this series Kinism FAQ. As someone who is relatively new to Kinist thought, this seems like a good way to help familiarize those like me with the concepts behind Kinism. I also found it interesting that yoy started with a defense of Christianity and not just Kinism istself. Do you find that there is a lot of anti-Christian sentiment in White Nationalist circles due to the influence of heathen/neopagan groups?
Yes indeed, James. We also have a comparison of Kinism and WN podcast on the audio archive page. Thanks for visiting, friend.
After listening to to the FAQ on “Is Christianity Jewish” I have one thought regarding kinism and white nationalist. It is 2 Corinthians chpt 6 vs 14 thru 18.
Don’t Be Yoked With Unbelievers
Don’t be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? What harmony is there between Christ and Belial? What does a believer have in common with a nonbeliever? What agreement is there between the temple of the living god ond idols? For we are the temple of the living god. As God has said “I will live with in them and walk among them and I will be their god and they will be my people.”
“Therefore come out from them and be separate.” says the lord
“Touch no unclean thing and I will recieve you. I will be a father to you, and you will be my sons and daughters, says the LORD ALMIGHTY.”
No disagreement here. The podcast was simply to answer their objections and prod them to come up with a substantial excuse for spurning our Lord. At the end of the day, their issue is a moral one with God, and the bad Christians out there are but smokescreen. Matt Parrot and I will be discussing how these two groups are to coexist in the new order. This show will be 2/23 and I’d be honored if you’d listen.
Their arms are to short to box with god.
by the way, loved your piece “Thugs and Killers bye any other name..” I recommended Theocrat Live to some freinds of mine here in PA. My wife and I strongly agree in taking our kids out the public school system. She teaches at a private school and the truth is she has students who’s parents are public school teachers. They distrust the system enough to remove their children from…… Thought you would like to know that
1. Jesus was raised up in the synagogues of these very people who he went on to denounce, he was probably even a rabbi:
http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/die-drachenhohle-w-david-in-texas-6-16-13/
2. The claim advanced is that Jesus’ revisions (or ‘fulfillment’) “of the law” are revisions of non-Biblical oral tradition of the Rabbis, a tradition which contradicts the Bible.
Let us see about that:
Matthew 5:
“21 Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment”
That’s right out of the Big Ten, and he goes on to add onto it the Jesus-characteristic “even the THOUGHT is evil” ‘clarifications’
“27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery”
Again: from Moses’ tablets, and Jesus adds more crimethink stipulations to it
“31 It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement”
Deuteronomy 24:
“1. When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house.
2 And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man’s wife.”
But this time, Jesus actually strikes down this law:
Matthew 5:
“32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.”
Continuing with Matthew 5:
“33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:”
This is addressed in multiple places, but best in Deuteronomy 23, as it leaves no question that this is a prescribed practice:
“21 When thou shalt vow a vow unto the Lord thy God, thou shalt not slack to pay it: for the Lord thy God will surely require it of thee; and it would be sin in thee.
22 But if thou shalt forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in thee.
23 That which is gone out of thy lips thou shalt keep and perform; even a freewill offering, according as thou hast vowed unto the Lord thy God, which thou hast promised with thy mouth.”
And again, Jesus goes and proscribes this Biblically mandated practice:
Matthew 5:
“34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God’s throne:
35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.
36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.
37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.”
Matthew 5:
“38 Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:”
Specific penalties for offenses and general statements about the principles of penalty are discussed in Exodus 21:
“. . . 22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
24 Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25 Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
26 And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye’s sake. . .”
Once again, Jesus “fulfill”s the law by demolishing it:
Matthew 5:
“39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.
41 And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.
42 Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.”
Matthew 5:
“43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you”
Numbers 31 is as good an example as any of what is Biblically directed to “do . . . to them that hate you” (or don’t even hate you, as the case may be)