disturbing trend has been steadily gaining momentum in Christian circles for the past four decades, affecting both young and old Earth creationists alike. In trying to expose the various flaws of Darwinian evolution, both camps are of one accord that evolution’s chief goal is racism. Their conclusion, though, plays right into the hand of the enemy, and without realizing they’ve been hoodwinked, they continue to fight the invisible sin of racism, not realizing its source.
Darwin Provides the Background
In 1859, Charles Darwin, a proud Englishmen from a prominent English family, pinned the evolutionary theories of the day into a cumulative work, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Survival of the Fittest in the Preservation of Favoured Races. His work was an immediate success in the bourgeois society of Europe that had long wanted to distance themselves from the law of God. In their minds, Charlie had proven they were nothing more than highly advanced animals; therefore they were no longer beholden to follow the restrictive requirements the Bible placed on how they should live. The faith their fathers had followed for ages was laughed off as a primitive superstition for unlearned men. In their minds, Darwin had provided the means to kill God.
The leading scientists of Darwin’s day then committed to bring acceptance to his idea, by making it the framework for almost every branch of science, including the fledgling science of anthropology. These early anthropologists placed their observations into the Darwinian framework, which in their mind explained behaviors of the primitive tribes they studied. Their first thought wasn’t racism, but that they were observing evolution in motion, the transformation from man to beast. This was because the prevailing idea of the day was orthogenesis, which was the belief that man goes through stages on his ascent from ape to human, with Caucasians being the latest step and other races being slightly lower in the pecking order.
As the scientific circles began to embrace evolution, they began to feel proud of how high the white race had climbed sociologically and technologically, seemingly light years ahead of some of the races. Despite this pride and contrary to what Ken Ham and hordes of other creationists teach, they didn’t seek the destruction of the other races. Many of these early evolutionists had abolitionist sentiments feeling compassion for the lower man, as they called the black race[i]. Even Darwin in the Descent of Man, came to the conclusion that given the proper amount of time and environmental stimuli, the non-white races would eventually catch and possibly surpass the achievements of the white race. What these scientists felt as pride in the accomplishments of their race, moderns decry as bigotry and racism. As a result, the father of the modern creation movement, Henry Morris, Jr., coined the phrase, “Evolution is racism with a vengeance.”[ii]
Marx Steps In
After the release of Darwin’s book in 1859, the 1250 copies sold quickly, with a few copies falling into the hands of an ambitious rabble-rouser in Germany, Friedrich Engles. He was immediately enthralled, thinking he’d found a biological explanation for the Marxist idea of the elimination of classes. Without hesitation, he sent a copy to his partner and friend, Karl Marx, along with a note on December 12, 1859 that read
Darwin, by the way, whom I’m reading just now, is absolutely splendid. There was one aspect of teleology that has yet to be demolished, and that has now been done. Never before has so grandiose an attempt been made to demonstrate historical evolution in Nature, and certainly never to such good effect. One does, of course, have to put up with the crude English method.[iii]
It would be nearly a year later that Marx would finally find the time to read Darwin’s book, which had the same confirming effect on him. Enthusiastically, he penned a letter on January 16, 1861 to his friend Ferdinand Lassalle, in which he gave his recommendation:
Darwin’s book is very important and serves me as a basis in natural selection for the class struggle in history. One has to put up with the crude English method of development, of course. Despite all deficiencies, not only is a death blow dealt here for the first time to “Teleology”, in the natural sciences but their rational meaning is empirically explained.[iv]
Marx would later dedicate his pivotal book, Das Kapital to Charles Darwin, even after Darwin declined to endorse the book.
Despite the enthusiasm these men felt for Darwin’s book, their motivation was far different than that of Darwin’s. While Darwin had pride in his race’s accomplishments, these men wanted the elimination of classes within society, which they hoped would later spell the elimination of race itself from the minds of later generations. Their driving motivation was that Marx, Engles, and Lassalle (who would later found the First Worker’s Party in Germany) were all proud Jewish men that despised the national pride that Darwin had shown. As Jews during this time period, they weren’t allowed to be citizens of Germany because of the Jews’ continual usurious schemes. These men reckoned the only way for the Jewish people to be assimilated into German society was to eliminate classes all together, with no man better than the next. This explains why in each mention of Darwin’s books they always jabbed at him with his “crude English methods”, which should be properly interpreted as Darwin’s national and racial pride.
With Marx’s endorsement of Darwin’s book, a noticeable divide in the God-hating camps of Europe began in the late 19th century. On one side were the Darwinists who, while feeling compassion for the lesser races, proudly saw themselves as the pinnacle of the animal kingdom with no chance of other races catching up. On the other side, the Marxists, while espousing a belief they were nothing more than animals, viewed the world through the socialistic lens of egalitarianism because they desired the white race dethroned and replaced by Jews. Therefore, these two camps, while having the same foundation, were at war with each other for nearly a century before the national pride of Darwinism succumbed to the politically correct dogma that Marx taught. In the process, countless non-Jewish evolutionists were duped into following the cause of the Jews in destroying European nationalism.
When looking at this divergence, it’s also important to note that modern creationists turn a blind eye to the goals of the Marxists while demonizing the national pride of the early Darwinists by calling them racists. In this sleight of hand, the creationists espouse the teachings of Marx and his followers in regards to egalitarianism, labeling them as godly attributes which dispose the sin of racism. In doing so, creationists join the quiver of Marx’s kooks ( the sodomites, Communists, socialists, pedophiles, abortionists, feminists) – the very groups they work so hard to fight.
Looking back at this split, the early school of Darwinists generally had the keys to the scientific fields up until around 1900. Despite their pagan beliefs that they we are animals, they did some excellent work in trying to understand the anthropological differences between the races, though not always using the most moral means of acquiring subjects.[v] They believed the races descended from one common ancestor and had diverged into separate races; as a result they sought the mechanisms at play in formulating the races. Language, art, ability, physical features, intelligence, and cognitive ability were all studied in an attempt to sort out the origin of race. It was the golden age of anthropology. Now their methods and conclusions are deemed a racist chapter in the history of science, and are shunned by most everyone in academia.
Franz Boas Dominates
At the dawn of the 20th century, the budding science of anthropology was rocked by the work of one man with an agenda: Franz Boas. Born in Germany and transplanted to the United States, he had a strong Jewish identity and believed, as Marx did, that classes should be eliminated, but went one step further by saying that race didn’t exist. By claiming race was nothing more than a social construct, he advocated the elimination of all talk of race from the scientific community. In his mind the mere mention of race was on par with anti-Semitism.
Upon reaching America, Boas embarked on an anthropological study of the Inuit Eskimos, falling in love with their culture. He felt they were not different from him on the basis of heredity, but instead because of the harsh environment in which they lived. This would later spawn the nature versus nurture argument, with Boas choosing nature. In his writings he felt that, had his ancestors lived in the same environment as the Inuits for a long enough period of time, they’d be unidentifiable from the Inuits.[vi] He applied this theory to all of humanity, claiming no one was better than anyone else and that heredity had nothing to do with the outcome of intelligence or ability.
On the conclusion of his field research he made for the Smithsonian, which was the epicenter of anthropological study at the time. There his ideas were scoffed at by the non-Jewish scientists that said nurture, instead of nature, shaped humanity. This long held view had been proven before their eyes countless times, and they weren’t going to let what they considered a kook scientist with Marxist views subjugate them. Feeling up against a wall, Boas soon left with a goal of finding a way to overtake what he deemed as a clique of racist scientists in all of the major museums in America.
Rejected, he fled to Columbia University where he convinced the Dean to let him unify the four anthropology classes into one class that offered the first doctoral program in anthropology anywhere in the world. The Dean jumped at the opportunity without understanding the goals Boas had. This new program which Boas called academic anthropology budded rapidly and quickly overtook his opposition that still dominated the museum side of the science. As he churned out new disciples, they too went on to teach at numerous Universities that desired a successful Boasian anthropology department. By 1926, every major department of anthropology in America was headed by a student of Boas, with a high number of them being Jewish.[vii]
Within a period of two decades the Boasians had gained full control of the museums, with his second granted Ph.D. Robert Lowie, an Austrian Jew, taking the first step by becoming the assistant director of the AMNH in New York City in 1908. The ploy they used on any defectors was to label them as anti-Semitic, solely for challenging Boas’s theories.[viii] This tactic was used by both his Jewish students as well as his non-Jewish students. In their minds, Boas was akin to a great and powerful king to whom they forced all others into submission, even if it involved forceful means.
Herbert Lewis, a Boas worshipper, gave a glimpse into the Talmudic drive of Boas which he instilled in his students:
He insisted upon freedom of inquiry and freedom of expression and was devoted to the idea that a person should develop his or her own “innate powers” and should be a thinking, independent individual. He fought against the constraints of tradition and convention (“the shackles of dogma”) all his life.[ix]
It was the idea of breaking the shackles of dogma which Boas’ future students would take into numerous other fields that they’d pollute with Boasian garbage. Some of these students, who had earned their Ph.D. on the weakest of requirements[x], had a common goal of destroying the Christian worldview of America, which in Boas’ mind was the ultimate in tearing down barriers.
A high number of students were also Jews that felt their people had been oppressed; therefore, they took to the cause of the American Indians. Their works would later be the foundation for Indian advocacy groups, spawning the disapprobation of whites in America. His most famous student, Margaret Mead, a sexually deviant non-Jew, would apply the wicked ideas of Alfred Kinsey to Boas’s, which in turn would become the driving force behind the sexual revolution. The last doctorate he awarded was to Ashley Montagu, a Jew born Israel Ehrenberg who would later become an advisor on race relations to the United Nations. His work was highly touted among civil rights leaders, giving them scientific backing for their fight. Black periodicals and other media were always anxious to carry anything written by Montagu for their cause.
Sigmund Freud Joins the Fight
No study on tracing the history of Marxism to the present is complete without some mention of Sigmund Freud. Like Marx, Engles, and Boas, Freud had a strong Jewish identity, often comparing his struggle to overcome occidental thought to Hannibal scaling the Alps to fight the Romans.[xi] While the thrust of his research was exploring suppressed sexual thoughts, his contribution to the study of race denial should not be overlooked.
Before Freud began his hack field of psychoanalysis, the prevailing belief in psychology was behavioral science, which was considered a valid science strictly following the scientific model. Freud’s pseudo-science, on the other hand, ignored the scientific model by letting feeling and emotions rather than empirical data dictate the outcome. His ideas were quickly thrown out of psychology circles, but they dominated the field of psychiatry for decades.[xii] They were eventually replaced after standing for almost five decades, but it was to0 late, for the damage had been done.
By the time psychiatrists began unraveling the lies he’d spun, they realized Freud wasn’t a scientist but a clever conman looking out for his own interests. Even Freud echoed their sentiments with this statement in a letter to a friend:
I am actually not at all a man of science, not an observer, not an experimenter, not a thinker. I am by temperament nothing but a conquistador—an adventurer, if you want it translated—with all the curiosity, daring, and tenacity characteristic of a man of this sort.[xiii]
What Freud did was monumental for his time: He’d thumbed his nose at the establishment and told generations of people it was okay for them to live out their oppressed sexual desires no matter how sick and deranged they may seem. This had a profound impact on Alfred Kinsey, the son of a preacher-turned-bisexual sexologist upon whom, as aforementioned, was relied heavily by Margaret Mead. Both Kinsey and Mead’s research would be the driving agent in taking the Jewish business of pornography mainstream to water down the masses with illicit sex. Following Freud’s rule that it was normal to embrace taboos; the porn industry touted interracial sex as the hip thing for everyone to do. Kinsey and Mead both agreed and both experimented with this individually in a variety of ways. As a result, now we’re told that the best way to overcome any ill racial sentiment we might have is to sleep with a member of that race, even if it’s just a one night stand. Now, miscegenation has grown from something once done in secrecy and shrouded by shame to an in-your-face and full-on attack on Christian morals. The role Freud played in this should never be underestimated.
The Frankfurt School Takes Over
Founded in the 1920s in Germany, the Frankfurt School was a group of Jewish intellectuals which synthesized the works of Marx with Freud and placed them within an evolutionary Talmudic worldview. Their influence quickly spread with the sole purpose of combating anti-Semitic thought and overturning what they saw as the western domination of the world. This leftist group soon was influencing a great number of students in German universities, causing them to feel ashamed of the accomplishments of the German people. Their goal was to break the rising post WWI nationalism percolating about Germany.
By 1935, Germans were again a proud people and saw the damage the group was doing, which in short time spelled the group’s eviction after Hitler realized they were superimposing Talmudic thought on impressionable young minds. They fled to Geneva but quickly left Europe for the fertile shores of America where Jews were taken in by the thousands in the 1930s.[xiv] They soon found a home where they were free to write anything they wished without being questioned by the masses.
Once on American shores they realized that their tactics which relied heavily on Freud’s shunning of the scientific model wouldn’t be accepted in America. Therefore, they began an empirical study to gain credibility with American academia. The results of this study were published in 1950 in their ground breaking book, The Authoritarian Personality, which set the precedent that defined anti-Semitism. It was touted as a study meant to find the dictator-type personality elements in society, but the study didn’t disclose the stringent criterion. The authors sought out only non-Jewish white students who had grown up in homes involving a strong nuclear family with a father that guided the family in the ways of his fathers. If that criterion wasn’t met, the test results were thrown out. The same was done for any minorities that took the test, but their results were not added to the data. By conducting the study in this manner, they found the results they were looking for, that only whites were capable of anti-Semitism, echoing the oft quoted tort, “I wouldn’t have seen it if I hadn’t believed it.”[xv]
This hatred of the white nuclear Christian family continued with this group. They realized the greatest threat to any Jewish agenda was to destroy the strong father figure within the home, especially if he embraced Christianity and trained his children in its precepts. They also sought to destroy any sense of patriotism, by comparing it to Nazism. Therefore they advocated for young adults to reject their families teaching and ideals by building their worldview on what they as individuals wanted. By beholding no one but themselves, these citizens of the future could then be committed to better serving humanity – by serving a Jewish agenda.
This was the first example of ethno-politics to hit America, the influences of which were damning. After invading the universities in the 50’s, they soon sought other means to destroy western civilization. By applying their critical theory to the Civil Rights movement, they were instrumental in convincing liberal whites that racism was a genetic disorder only found in whites. This rallied a slew of misled whites to stand for the rights of blacks. Then, opposite their recommendations for whites, they called for blacks to build better families by having a strong fatherly figure present. However, if a black man’s passion was for white women, that was acceptable and preferred to a pure black family.
Currently, the Frankfurt school has branched out with numerous hydra heads spreading their lies far and wide. One of their prime targets is squelching homophobia by trying to convince the world that this sinful practice is actually a good and necessary part of humanity. They advocate homosexuals to not only wed but to have children, either naturally or adopted, and to build homosexual families that will instill their children with a homosexual worldview. As a result, the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) agenda is one of the most hateful, Christ-hating groups haunting the world today, proudly showing their deviant behavior in perverse gay pride parades in cities across America. As they reach out to infect young people with their sinful lifestyle, one of their primary targets is white people, which perfectly fits the Frankfurt school’s paradigm: elimination of the white Christian nuclear family.
Another prime target is economics where they have installed the Talmudic idea of usury as a positive force, arguing that debt is actually healthy for individuals as well as sovereign nations. In the destruction of white civilization, they give each new white liberal they produce a ball and chain of debt that they’ll carry the rest of their life. What’s worse is they make these naive young dummies like it and beg for more while never questioning the prison they’re in. These prisoners will eventually be a driving force in support of the Euro and are currently pushing for a world currency to better serve the Frankfurt School’s socialistic agenda.
Perhaps most disturbing amongst the group’s present activities is history revisionism. Because of their encouragement, no longer are the early Spanish explorers considered white as the numerous eye-witness accounts and portraits testify, but they’d have us believe some may have been black. This ludicrous idea has even been asked of notable men like Shakespeare and Columbus. The beautiful architecture that graces Europe has even been called into question by asking if some of the architects and workers were black. This group’s influence has scores of people now searching for pictures of Mozart, wondering if he may have been a mulatto. In the near future, they may attempt to write whites and early Americans out of Europe all together. Scoff if you may, but look no further than their first and proudest revision to dupe generations of people into believing in a German holocaust of the Jewish people.
The Creationists Submit
Now the creation ministries, with Answers in Genesis being the most vocal, enjoy making the connection between Darwin, Marx, and Freud on an evolutionary basis, but are careful to stay on the politically-correct side of the line. Never do they mention anywhere in their literature anything about Boas, or his fraudulent studies. Instead, they label Darwin and company as racists, and then in the next breath blame them for rise of the Nazis, Stalin, and worldwide Communism, always making sure to play the strings of the holocaust for added emotional effect.
These ministries, despite the great work they do in other areas, ignore the motivation that Marx had on European Jews like Boas and Freud and how their work was driven home by the Frankfurt School. Instead, they would have us believe evolutionary thought always leads to a Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia, while hiding the fact that egalitarianism and the myth of the sin of racism stemmed from the same dung heap as evolution. But that’s not a battle they wish to fight; if they did they’d be deemed anti-Semitic, racist, bigots and lose most of their funding. So they continue to ride the politically correct train like good little lackeys, not admitting the rest of the patrons in the train are enemies of Christ.
Besides espousing the Jewish idea that whites are the only ones being capable of racism, they now are in the business of selling the lie of miscegenation. By use of clever illustrations and whimsical songs, they tell us as long as two people are Christian they can be married, because their race isn’t important. This lie stands in opposition to 2000 years of Christian history in which miscegenation was frowned upon as a thing pagans did in their defiance of God. But to the creationists, they’re combating white guilt and stamping out the sin of racism, by encouraging our children to marry outside their race.
To counter the onslaught of these ministries, their impact must first be realized. They visit hundreds of churches per year, selling thousands of books and media. For the most part, much of what they say to oppose evolution is good, their work on dinosaurs is especially good, and they’re dedicated to keeping the family intact with a godly father as their head. Therefore, it stands to reason that they’d be willing to expose the Frankfurt School’s attack on the occidental family; but they stand silent. If they did speak out, they’d quickly unveil the Frankfort School’s true agenda, in turn calling their own teachings on race and miscegenation into question which would mean expensive retractions on dozens of books and videos they’ve produced. So they continue to peddle the lies of Boas and his Jewish ilk to Christians that trust the creation ministries as the experts on everything they discuss. These unknowing Christians then fall for the Boasian lie without ever questioning the ministry.
If you financially support a creation ministry, let them know you’ll no longer support a ministry that sells the Marxist fueled Boasian lie that race doesn’t exist. Even if you don’t give to a creation ministry, let them know they should teach that God wishes to preserve each race and that they should quit advocating the destruction of the white race. But most importantly, in training your children in the fear of admonition in the Lord, don’t be ashamed of your people. Teach your children of the terrific things God has led the white race to do, and tell them the stories of the heroes that died for their kinsmen and kirk. Let them know there is nothing wrong with being proud of your race and that the only way to preserve the races is to marry within your race.
[ii] Morris would quote this in debates, speeches, and in several of his books. See the Long War Against God for an example.
[v] There is overwhelming evidence that scientists would pay for subjects to be hunted and to study their skeletons. This murderous action was sinful and not condoned by the author.
[vii] White, Leslie (1966). “The social organization of ethnological theory.” Rice University Studies: Monographs in Cultural Anthropology, 52(4), p. 26.
[viii] Ibid, White, Leslie, p. 16.
[x] His first Ph.D. was given to Alfred L. Kroeber, who wrote a smallish 28 page dissertation. Most Ph.D. programs in the other sciences a dissertation was commonly well over 100 pages, with some numbering in the hundreds of pages.
[xi] Armstrong, S (2008), “Freud’s Hannibal: New Light on Freud’s Moses.” Psychoanalytic Review, 95:231-257.
[xiii] Masson, Jeffrey Moussaieff (1985). The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess 1887-1904, in a letter written to Wilhelm Fliess February 1, 1900.
[xv] A phrase Herbert Marshall McLuhan was fond of saying.