Bastard Sons of Confederate Veterans

This abominable photo was celebrated on the official Sons of Confederate Veterans Facebook page. Notice quality comments such as “THE SOUTH RUULLEESS!!!!!!!!!” and  “bad ass mother f in marines!!.”  Also notice the pornographic/perverted  “shocker” sign the murderer middle-right is holding up. GO USA!

In the conversation to your right, the SCV Admin tried to spin the photo as an a-political and benign picture of “Southern” men continuing the tradition of carrying the battle flag into (unjust) wars. But something in his ethical theory appeared askew when Christian Gray, Robert Fort and others noticed that in the picture’s caption the Admin was calling any man (without qualification) who serves in the US army “brave,” and wishing all the mercenary scum in the photo a happy Veterans Day. Just what was the SCV Admin celebrating by pointing to a picture of modern day Lincoln troops invading another innocent nation?

Apparently when you suggest to a group which exists to honor its Confederate ancestors that its overtly Union-minded actions are actually dishonorable to the true CSA, you end up putting them in a position to choose whether to repent and lose membership from patriotards, or to continue fighting against the truth. The SCV chose the latter and conveniently used the censor button when Robert Fort told them where their real loyalty resides– it had something to do with a Rabbi’s penis and their colon. (Check out SWB’s take on this deplorable photo by the SCV.)

All — Christian Gray and Robert Fort have been removed and permanently banned from this page. Their comments have been deleted, as have the admin comments directed at them. I’m sure most all of us were raised with the maxim “If you can’t say something good, say nothing at all.” Those two apparently were not. We are not obliged to tolerate insults directed at our membership or our organization. The SCV appreciates your interest, your support, and your participation here on Facebook.

Basically, the Admin deleted the dissenting comments because they were right, and whacked his because they were devoid of substance. You have to keep a positive image when your job is to convince modern day Yankees to give you their money so that you and they can continue to brand Lincoln-Bush imperialism doctrine as “Southern” and “Confederate.” Who cares that the original Southerners and real Confederates would have shot SCV members on the spot for their allegiance with terrorists who invade independent States and wage war on their wives, children, and cattle?

Check out the same SCV Admin’s comments on a great photo he posted of Lincoln and Sherman. Now, just imagine him posting a photo of Lincoln and Sherman holding the Confederate Battle flag in Richmond, VA on April, 1865 and you’ll understand why we’re upset.

Earlier this year the SCV held a rally to celebrate Confederate President Jefferson Davis’ inauguration. It was a prime time for the group to practice its First Amendment right by proudly “preserving  the history and legacy of  [Confederate soldier] heroes” for whom “the preservation of liberty and freedom was the motivating factor in the South’s decision to fight…” and while proclaiming that such actions were “guaranteed by the Constitution.”

But when another Confederate fan tried to practice his Second Amendment right by passing out literature at the event, the SCV assisted in the 78-year-old man’s arrest.

Of course, newspaper publisher Olaf Childress‘s message was far different from the SCV’s. You see, real Confederates like Childress aren’t afraid to call out frauds like MLK and unabashedly affirm the real position of Jefferson Davis. No, the SCV is more motivated to disassociate itself with non-PC categories than to represent the non-PC Confederates who died then to secure what the SCV denies today.

Speaking of the real Jeff Davis (emphasis mine)…

On the slave population:

In moral and social condition they had been elevated from brutal savages into docile, intelligent, and civilized agricultural laborers, and supplied not only with bodily comforts but with careful religious instruction. Under the supervision of a superior race their labor had been so directed as not only to allow a gradual and marked amelioration of their own condition, but to convert hundreds of thousands of square miles of the wilderness into cultivated lands covered with a prosperous people…

Writing to Abraham Lincoln:

We at the South do think African Slavery, as it exists with us, both morally and politically right. This opinion is founded upon the inferiority of the Black race.

The Cornerstone Speech, a controversial speech in Savannah, GA where Stephens discussed the new Confederate Constitution and the reasons for secession:

But not to be tedious in enumerating the numerous changes for the better, allow me to allude to one other — though last, not least. The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution — African slavery as it exists amongst us — the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the rock upon which the old Union would split. He was right…. [Stephens next discussed the idea that slavery would eventually pass away.] Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the storm came and the wind blew.

Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests upon the great truth, that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery — subordination to the superior race — is his natural and normal condition.

This, our new government, is the first in the history of the world based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth. This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science. It has been so even amongst us. Many who hear me, perhaps, can recollect well, that this truth was not generally admitted, even within their day. The errors of the past generation still clung to many as late as twenty years ago. Those at the North, who still cling to these errors, with a zeal above knowledge, we justly denominate fanatics. All fanaticism springs from an aberration of the mind — from a defect in reasoning. It is a species of insanity. One of the most striking characteristics of insanity, in many instances, is forming correct conclusions from fancied or erroneous premises; so with the anti-slavery fanatics; their conclusions are right if their premises were. They assume that the negro is equal, and hence conclude that he is entitled to equal privileges and rights with the white man. If their premises were correct, their conclusions would be logical and just — but their premise being wrong, their whole argument fails. I recollect once of having heard a gentleman from one of the northern States, of great power and ability, announce in the House of Representatives, with imposing effect, that we of the South would be compelled, ultimately, to yield upon this subject of slavery, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics, as it was in physics or mechanics. That the principle would ultimately prevail. That we, in maintaining slavery as it exists with us, were warring against a principle, a principle founded in nature, the principle of the equality of men. The reply I made to him was, that upon his own grounds, we should, ultimately, succeed, and that he and his associates, in this crusade against our institutions, would ultimately fail. The truth announced, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics as it was in physics and mechanics, I admitted; but told him that it was he, and those acting with him, who were warring against a principle. They were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal.

Did the SCV recognize and honor these quotes at their little Jefferson Davis gathering? Hell no they didn’t, because they would be called bad names by Christ-hating Jews who believe our Savior is boiling in excrement [p. 14]. In fact, the Southern Poverty Law Center (run by rich Jews, not poor blacks) denounced the gathering anyway.

Our friend and real champion for the Confederate cause, James Edwards, has adequately summarized the true modus operandi of the SCV:

Some in the SCV must think that if they can prove themselves worthy by sacrificing Olaf, the media and various left-wing hate organizations will give them a pass and stop falsely accusing them of “racism.”

They’re wrong.

Even though Jefferson’s view was plain that the Negro needs to be under the supervision of a superior race, and that slavery (not equality) is the Negro’s proper natural and normal condition, a moral and political right based on their inferiority (a view shared by his contemporaries), this writer witnessed a SCV State Commander publicly praising a Negro’s use of the Confederate flag to justify racial unity, which the latter said was the principle reason the South raised its flag.

What? The commander insisted that today we can honor both the Confederacy and Civil Rights legislation. Sorry, Commander boy. You must stand up for the Southern cause in toto, or not stand at all.

Of course, this view permeates the SCV. I first found this Facebook page posted on a SCV chapter’s own Facebook wall. Nothing makes them happier than to welcome token Blacks into their bosom as equals. Below is a picture from their quarterly publication, Confederate Veteran.

Negro Member

How can an a organization who in all its twisted zeal for displaying their Yankee-defined Confederate flag still cave in when Yankees tell them to remove it?

Please tell me what “Southern” or “Confederate” means if  not the right of racial free association as defined by the actual Southerners and Confederates who took actual bullets for four miserable years? Please tell me whether the SCV is a group of natural sons, or a bunch of bastards unlawfully grafted in.

If the SCV works for your extinction rather than your existence, perhaps your Southern dollars are better spent here or here.

4 thoughts on “Bastard Sons of Confederate Veterans

  1. Fr. John

    Thank you for clarifying for this unreconstructing Yankee, the Sane, Proper, and BIBLICAL View of how the South saw the non-Elect in our midst, and why this must become not only normative again, but promulgated at any cost.

    Clearly, the O.T. Biblical ‘set apartness’ of the Chosen People (Adam’s seed) from those of other nations (the ‘goyim’) did not prohibit giving ‘sojourners and slave’ the requisite ‘training in righteousness’, but it also assumed that the view ‘Better to be a door guard in the Kingdom’ than to pretend to equality outside of it! In short, there is a ‘great gulf’ fixed, between the sons of the race, and the two-tiered structure of Mosaic Ethnic Particularism, which the Church took over as the “Israel of God”, post A.D.70, and continued to practice until the Schism and the rise of the attendant heretical Papal ‘universal jurisdiction/universalist egalitarianism’ worldviews, post-1100.

    This has been the most difficult element in my re-education, along the lines of ‘What hath thy fathers believed?’ As I see the utter breakdown of the false religion of Equality and Egalitarianism, as it shatters like a Hyundai’s windshield when hit with a hammer in the light of the Obamanation, I now realize that ORION (Our Race Is Our Nation) is a fundamental premise of the Founding Fathers, the Orthodox, and Christendom’s first millennium- in short, all biblical nations of Chrsitendom, of the past.

    The opposing heresy to be fought tooth and nail, is the rise of non-ethnological boundaries, the fallacy of egalitarianism, the sin of Empire-building, and the theological filioquist Papal paradigm in Churchianity. The choice is between one or the other. There is no ‘middle ground.’ One is Christendom, the other, the false kingdom of Satania.

    Deo Volente, may we enlighten many sons to glory before this idological battle for the souls of Christendom is over…..

    – Fr. John+

  2. Kevin Alawine

    Thanks for this honest appraisal of the compromised SCV sir! My hat is off to you for your dignified rebuttal of their foolishness. Lee, Jackson and Forrest would have had absolutely NOTHING to do with this corrupted and deformed excuse for honor. A hex upon those that would wave our glorious Constitutional flag in a battle for Bolshevism and Israeli world domination!

    1. Tribal Theocrat Post author

      Thanks for the comment, friend. It saddens me that the SCV is a group that has enough members and wherewithal to oppose cultural Marxism. But instead they constantly bellow “We’re not a political organization,” as they patently support and endorse cultural Marxism.

  3. Jonny Reb

    The S.C.V are NOT basterd sons you sir must stop insulting those brave men you do not know what war is like because war is hell I fought for the USA in nam and you insult these men. Every night I sat in my filthy muddy water filled fox hole praying that the v.c would not slit my throut wile I slept good god the terrible things I saw. young kids these days think war is just a game but its not because you might be the one that gets shipped home in a box.
    So please stop and let people be proud of who they are!

Comments are closed.