Yearly Archives: 2010

The Talmud and Judeo-Christianity

Babylonian Talmud Set

Linked below is a document that includes scanned pages from the Talmud which teach Jewish supremacy, sexual perversions, and blasphemies of Jesus Christ. After reading some of the texts you should wonder:

  • Why do so many know about the ugly Koran teachings and not the ugly Talmudic ones?
  • Why hasn’t your MDiv-trained pastor told you this?
  • Why isn’t this stuff taught in seminary apologetics classes?
  • Why are the giant para-church ministries silent about this?
  • Why does our Gentile country continue to give billions in annual foreign aid to Israel without demanding an explanation?
  • Is it logical to worry over radical Muslims when their influence in US mass media, legislation, and education greatly pales in comparison to Jewish influence?
  • read more

    The Most Politically Incorrect Passage In the Bible

    Genesis 24:2-4

    And Abraham said unto his eldest servant of his house, that ruled over all that he had, Put, I pray thee, thy hand under my thigh: And I will make thee swear by the LORD, the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell: But thou shalt go unto my country, and to my kindred, and take a wife unto my son Isaac.

    Comments:

  • Righteous Abraham owned slaves. Not good.  Slave holding is bad.
  • Righteous Abraham treated his slave well. This too is bad.  Surely every slave holder in history must have beat his slave and deprived him of basic human rights, so that slavery may be decried as a moral evil.  How dare Abe put this slave in charge of all that he had?
  • Righteous Abraham opposed woman’s suffrage. Abe’s arrangement of his son’s marriage deprives the poor gal of  her right to choose her own groom. Boy and girl are supposed to meat at a coffee shop on mutual terms, footing their own lattes. They are not to meet by a tribal patriarch’s slave delegation.
  • Righteous Abraham opposed miscegenation. Abe did not want his daughter-in-law to be of another tribe. Rather he demanded that his son’s bride be of his kindred.
  • Righteous Abraham REALLY opposed miscegenation. Righteous Abraham made his slave swear to God not to bring back a racial foreigner.
  • Righteous Abraham’s criteria for his son’s bride elevated race above faith. His kindred were pagans. Better consanguinity than a mixed marriage.
  • Righteous Abraham’s tribe had its own country. Indeed, his country was precisely defined by his tribe.  Didn’t’ Hitler try that?
  • read more

    Jeff Gates: Guilt By Association

    We heartily recommend and encourage you to check out Jeff Gates. Gates is a an educator, attorney,  former investment banker, and for two decades an adviser to policy-makers worldwide. He’s also written a book called Guilt By Association which explains how a transgenerational and transnational criminal syndicate are, well, manipulating, killing, and enslaving the world. If you’re ever struggled with the Occam’s Razor critique of conspiracy theories, Gates’ explanation of the Cryptocracy’s methodology is one of the best material rebuttals and explanations I’ve read. read more

    Evasive Race-Denying Conservative Chrisitans

    Liberal race-mixers who pose as conservatives need to consider these two points in these next two posts, and then refute them without using their cop-out “racist,” “bigot,” “Nazi,” or “white-supremacist” rhetoric. So read this slowly and remember that in debate no one cares for your feelings, and you will be awarded no points for visceral responses. What is valued most is critical thinking--clear theses, arguments and rebuttals.

    10 Facts Public School Never Told You About Lincoln’s War

    I recently tweeted the top 10 facts your State school never told you about Lincoln’s war (the “Civil” war). After I finished I realized number 8 was duplicate. So I deleted 4, and mentioned it under 5.

    Here are the top  10 facts ,with some expatiation via bullet points now that I’m not limited to 140 characters.

    10. The  civil war was not a civil war; those are between men within ONE nation. The CSA was a duly formed nation that was invaded by the hostile US.

    I may expand more on this later, but for now it’s a simple point worth pondering. This is why Confederates hated the term Civil War. The name itself is a term given by the Northern victors. Someone once wrote, “no conquered people ever wrote the accepted history of the conquest.” read more

    Female Modesty: To Cover or Reveal?

    It's difficult to make modesty standards, but here's a helpful rule of thumb with tight clothing. When you can make a true-scale plaster caster mold of your body parts with your clothes on, your clothes are too tight.

    Secrets of the Federal Reserve

    If there is a single reason why our nation is bankrupt, it is the insidious, ungodly, and unconstitutional Federal Reserve System (and the Jewish international bankers that run it). If there is a single topic avoided by your pastor and politician (save Ron Paul) regarding our economic problems it is the Federal Reserve System. They keep telling you to pay your taxes, encouraging you to invest in assets backed by our falling,  fiat dollar, and cautioning you against buying precious metals. The Inflation Calculator data notwithstanding, there  is no problem with the Magical Money Machine. Just trust them. read more

    DeMar’s Debacle on Slavery

    Liberals love the myth of equality. They would probably die for it.

    Fortunately for us they defend it in template fashion. The liberal emotionally distances himself from his opponent’s non-egalitarian view, which is evil prima facie. Such views are wicked not because Scripture and necessary inference denounce them, but because that is the category assigned to them by their other divided loyalty, political correctness (James 1:8; Matthew 6:24).  To the degree that the liberal actually argues against his opponent he only defends his disdain of a taboo position, usually a wishful straw man that he illogically connects to his opponent’s  actual position. Of course the liberal’s argumentation is only offered by way of backfill due to the visceral attachment he has already made against his opponent. Hence the reason egalitarian arguments are always emotive sound bites lacking any semblance of substance. It is also why, in the rare moments when the liberal properly identifies  his opponent’s thesis and posits an honest rebuttal, a beginning student of logic can quickly apply the appropriate fallacy. read more